.png)
Aktivitas Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika dengan Berpikir Komputasi Berbantuan Chat-GPT
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis bagaimana aktivitas siswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran dengan konsep berpikir komputasi berbantuan program Chat-GPT dapat mempegaruhi kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menerapkan desain penelitian eksploratif. Sejumlah 60 siswa dari kelas XI di SMA Islam Plus Adzkia Medan menjadi subjek dalam penelitian. Analisis data penelitian diawali dengan pengorganisasian, mendeskripsikan data, dan pengujian secara statistik. Hasil dari penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa 61,67% siswa memiliki kemampuan yang baik dalam melakukan dekomposisi, mengenali pola, melakukan abstraksi, dan berpikir algoritmik saat menghadapi masalah matematika. Terdapat perbedaan dalam kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah sebelum dan setelah dilakukan proses pembelajaran. Keaktifan siswa dalam pembelajaran dengan menggunakan konsep berpikir komputasi berbantuan Chat-GPT secara signifikan mempengaruhi 57,4% kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aminah , N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., Maat, S. M. (2023). Student Activities In Solving Mathematics Problems With A Computational Thinking Using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 613-621. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308
Aminah, N., Sukestiyamo, Y., Wardono, dan Cahyono, A. N. (2022). A Teaching Practice Design Based on a Computational Thinking Approach for Prospective Math Teachers Using Ed-Tech Apps. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(14), 43–62. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i14.30463
Bouck, E. C., Sands, P., Long, H., dan Yadav, A. (2021). Preparing Special Education Preservice Teachers to Teach Computational Thinking and Computer Science in Mathematics.Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 44(3), 221–238. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888406421992376
Bower, M., Leigh, N., Jennifer, W. M., Lister, R. (2017). Improving the Computational Thinking Pedagogical Capabilities of School Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3): 53-72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
Cynthia, S., dan Woollard, J. (2013).Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition.ITiCSE Conference, (Online).Diakses pada 03 Agustus 2023.Tersedia di: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356481
Gadanidis, G., Cendros, R., Floyd, L., dan Namukasa, I. (2017).Computational thinking in mathematics teacher education.Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(4), 458–477. (Online).Diakses pada 03 Agustus 2023. Tersedia di: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173103/
Gao, S. (2020). Innovative teaching of integration of artificial intelligence and university mathematics in big data environment.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 750(1).http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/750/1/012137
Gray, E., dan Tall, D. (2007).Abstraction as a natural process of mental compression.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 23–40. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03217454
Haji, S. (2018).Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyesaikan Soal-Soal PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) di SMP Kota Bengkulu.Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 03(02) : 177–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v3i2.7522
Hasibuan, S., dan Chairad, M. (2023). The Development Of Augmented Reality (AR) In Anatomy Course. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(3): 744-754. doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3282
Kallia, M., Van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021).Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: A literature-informed Delphi study.Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2): 159–187. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104
Kwan Lo, C. (2023). What is the impact of chatgpt on education? a rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 4-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Li, F., dan Wang, C. Artifcial intelligence and edge computing for teaching quality evaluation based on 5G-enabled wireless communication technolog. Journal of Cloud Computing, 12(1): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-023-00418-6
Lock, S. (2022). What is AI Chatbot Phenomenon Chat-GPT and Could It Replace Humans?. (Online). Diakses pada 03 Agustus 2023. Tersedia di: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/05/what-is-ai-chatbot-phenomenon-chatgpt-and-could-it-replace-humans
Looi, C. K., How, M.L., Longkai, W., Seow, P., dan Liu. (2018). Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking.Computer Science Education, 28, (3), 255–279. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297
Maharani, S., Kholid, M.N., Pradana, L.N., Nusantara, T. (2019). Problem Solving In The Context Of Computational Thinking. Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2): 109–116. doi : https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p109-116
Marcelino, M. J., Pessoa, T., Vieira, C., Salvador, T., dan Mendes, A. J. (2018). Learning Computational Thinking and scratch at distance. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 470–477. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.025
Nurwita, F., Kusumah, Y. S., dan Priatna, N. (2022). Exploring students’ mathematical computational thinking ability in solving pythagorean theorem problems. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2): 273-287. doi: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.12496
Nurwita, F., Kusumah,Y. S., Priatna, N. (2022). Exploring students’ mathematical computational thinking ability in solving pythagorean theorem problems. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 273-287. doi: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.12496
Pala, F. K., dan Türker, P. M. (2021). The effects of different programming trainings on the computational thinking skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1090–1100, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635495
Piaget, J. (2013). The Construction of Reality in The Child (First Edition). London: Routledge.
Priyanda, R., dkk. (2023). Difusi Inovasi Pendidikan.Sukoharjo: Pradina Pustaka.Diakses di: https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Difusi_Inovasi_Pendidikan/ld60EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=difusi+inovasi+pendidikan&pg=PA8&printsec=frontcover
Rich, P. J., Egan, G., dan Ellsworth, J. (2019). A Framework for Decomposition in Computational Thinking. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 416–421, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319793
Selby, C. C. (2015). Relationships: computational thinking, pedagogy of programming, and Bloom’s Taxonomy. Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 80–87. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818315
Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications.
Sukestiyarno, Y. (2020). Research Educational Method. Semarang: UNNES Press.
Supiarmo, M. G., Hadi, H.S., dan Tarmuzi. (2022). Student’s Computational Thinking Process In Solving Pisa Questions In Terms Of Problem Solving Abilities. Journal Of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(1), 1-11. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i1
Susanti, R. D., dan Taufik, M. Analysis of Student Computational Thinking in Solving Social Statistics Problems. Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 22-31. doi :http://dx.doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v5i1.4376
Sysło, M. M. (2015). From Algorithmic to Computational Thinking.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742582.
Voskoglou, M. G., & Buckley, S. (2012). Problem solving and computational thinking in a learning environment. Egyptian Computer Science Journal, 36(4): 28-46. doi:
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1212.0750
Weintrop, D., dkk. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1): 127-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-015-9581-5
Wing,J. M. (2017).Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all.Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
Zahid, M. Z. (2020). Telaah kerangka kerja PISA 2021: Era integrasi computational thinking dalam bidang matematika [Review of the PISA 2021 framework: The era of integrating computational thinking in the field of mathematics]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3(2): 706–713.
Zhai, X. (2023).ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education.SSRN: 1-18.(Online).Diakses Pada 02 Agustus 2023.Tersedia di : http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zulhilmi, M., Hidayat, R., Nabilah, N., Norhafiza, Hakim, M.K., Nurshafikah, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v5i2.3469
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in Jurnal Mathema are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.