Differentiated Learning Using ESS-MATH-Based PBL Model on Problem-Solving Ability Reviewed from Learning Style

Bagas Ardiyanto, Fery Firmansah, Tasari Tasari

Abstract


The development of the era of globalization is accelerating, which must be supported by the ability of expert students. This study aims to find out how content-differentiated learning through the ESS-MATH-based Problem-Based Learning model affects the ability of class X students of SMK N 1 Klaten to solve problems from a learning style. This study uses a descriptive approach with qualitative research methods. The instruments used were David Kolb's learning style questionnaire, the ESS-MATH application and problem-solving ability questions. The results obtained are that the application of content-differentiated learning using the ESS-MATH-based PBL model is able to improve students' skills in problem-solving according to their learning style. The ESS-MATH application is a new alternative in the implementation of content-differentiated learning because it can meet the learning needs of students and ease of use.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustin, E. M., Solfitri, T., & Anggraini. (2024). Problem Based Learning: Solusi Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. MATHEMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 235-244.

Andini, D. W. (2016). “Differentiated Instructions”: Solusi Pembelajaran dalam Keberagaman Siswa di Kelas Inklusif. Trihayu, 2(3), 259034.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach Ninth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Barber, W., King, S., & Buchanan, S. (2015). Problem Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Digital Pedagogy: Embracing The Role of Colaborative Communities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(2).

Bardi & Jailani. (2015). Pengembangan Multimedia Berbasis Komputer untuk Pembelajaran Matematika bagi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi: Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(1), 49-53.

Bire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 44(2), 168-174.

Davita, P. W. C., & Pujiasturi, H. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Gender. KREANO : Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 110-117.

Evendi, H., Rosida, Y., & Zularfan, D. (2023). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Kurikulum Merdeka SMPN 4 Kragilan. JOONG-KI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 181-186.

Hajaro, M., Nayazik, A., & Kusumawati, R. (2021). Analysis of David Kolb’s Learning Style Accoding to Mathematical Representation Ability. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 5(2), 403-416.

Jalinus, N., Ganefri, Syahril, Wulansari, R. E., Nabawi, R. A., Yunos, J. M., & Kiong, T. T. (2020). Comparison of Learning Style between Engineering, and Non-Engineering Students in Vocational Education. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(12), 283-294.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Implementasi Kecakapan Abad 21 Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Direktur Pembinaan SMA.

Kemristekdikti. (2018). Mempersiapkan SDM Indonesia di Era Industri 4.0. in Ristekdikti, 1-22.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experinetial Learning in Higher Education. Acadeemy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.

Kurniasari, R. T. A., Koeshandayono, S., & Akbar, S. (2020). Perbedaan Higher Order Thingking Skills pada Model Problem Based Learning Dan Model Konvensional. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 170-174.

Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2020). Using Differentiate Classroom Assessment to Enhance Student Learning. New York : Routledge.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nurhayati, E., Mulyana, T., & Martadipura, B. A. P. (2016). Penerapan Scaffolding untuk Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika, 2(2), 107-112.

Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve it, Second Edition. Princeton: New Jersey Princeton University Press.

Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program PISA terhadap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157.

Putri, D. P. E., & Muhtadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Kimia Berbasis Android Menggunakan Prinsip Mayer pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 38-47.

Putri, S. K., Saryantono, B., & Pratama, E. Y. (2023). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Presentasi Powerpoint terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII Semester Genap SMP Negeri 09 Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023. Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika (JMPM), 5(1), 11-22.

Rahmi, M. N., & Samsudi, M. A. (2020). Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Sesuai dengan Karakteristik Gaya Belajar. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 355-363.

Resa, A. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Berdasarkan Pendekatan Understanding by Design. Jurnal Primary, 4(1), 1-8.

Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif Ahmad Rijali UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17, 81-95.

Saadah. (2017). Penerapan Metode Diskusi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi Menggunakan Pecahan dalam Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas V SDN 003 Tembilahan Kota Kecamatan Tembilahan. Jurnal Primary Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 6(2), 539-545.

Sanusi, S. A., Surya, E., Syahputra, E., & Rais S. A. (2018). The Improving Mathematical Communication Ability and Students’ Self Regulation Learning Through Realistic Mathematical Approach Based on Batak Toba cultur. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 1397-1402.

Schleicher, A. (2018). Insights and Interpretations PISA 2018. OECD 2018, 63. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf.

Sugiarta, I. M., Mardana, I. B. P., Adiarta, A., & Artanayasa, I. W. (2019). Filsafat Pendidikan Ki Hadjar Dewantara (Tokoh Timur). Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 2(3), 124-136.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutarsih, T. & Hasyyati, A. (2018). Penggunaan dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (P2TIK) sektor pendidikan 2018. Jakarta: BPS-Statistics Indonesia

Wibowo, E. J. (2013). Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Matematika untuk Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Kelas IV. Seruni: Seminar Riset Unggulan Nasional Informatika dan Komputer, 2(1), 75-78.

Wicaksono, A. B., Chasanah, A. N., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berbasis Budaya ditinjau dari Gender dan Gaya Belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 240-251.

Zellatifany, C. M., & Mudjiyanto, B. (2018). Tipe Penelitian Deskripsi dalam Ilmu Komunikasi. Jurnal Diakom, 1, 83-90.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v7i1.4791

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License

Articles in Jurnal Mathema are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licenseslot raffi ahmadgacor4dhttps://jurnal.usk.ac.id/lib/pkp/sbobet88/robopragmalapak cheatturbox1000akun pro jepangsensorgacorscatter hitamyosi88 yosi88 yosi88 yosi88 yosi88 yosi88 hit88 hit88 hit88 hit88 hit88https://elijo.umpwr.ac.id/pages/idnslot/bokep indo